Lenders, Leopards, and Lions: The Violence of Avarice - Muslim Musings from Dante's Six, Seventh

Transcript Details

Event Name: Lenders, Leopards, and Lions: The Violence of Avarice - Muslim Musings from Dante's Six, Seventh
Transcription Date:Transcription Modified Date: 4/27/2019
Transcript Version: 1


Transcript Text

with you and

then to a foreigner you may charge

interest it's interesting st. jerome and

if you look at the early church father

st. jerome has a very famous statement

about ubi

just bel i boobie ATM juice user i if

it's just to wage war on them it's just

to charge users

that's how he understood that that the

that the stranger was actually somebody

who was an enemy and then this was the

Jubilee right you know what they would

say today our economist oh that creates

moral hazard right seriously that's

exactly how that how they would look at

that and then this is Ezekiel also right

so and and this is a just man who does

what's lawful and right he doesn't eat

on the mountains where the idolaters

used to eat and or lifted his eyes to

idols nor defiled his neighbor's wife

nor approached a woman in her impurity

if he has not oppressed anyone but he

has restored the debtor to his pledge

he's robbed no one by violence taken no

Ussery if he had not extracted using nor

taken any increase but has withdrawn his

hand from iniquity and executed true

justice between a man and a man if he

has walked in my statutes and kept my

justice judgments faithfully he is just

now in the Jewish tradition and the Jews

in European tradition were forced into

usury it's very interesting if you

studied they used that a lot of the

European sovereigns would have the Jews

as tax collectors and this is like

having african-american police in inner

cities do you know it's it's it's it's

kind of it I mean that's an opposite

example of that it's trying to deflect

but it's what the tax collector when he

was Jewish if he would come they would

see the Jew and not the sovereign so

they would see the Jew as an oppressor

and that was literally designed I mean

these people were were Machiavellian in

their in their in their outlook so but

this is from the Talmud every man's

Talmud by dr. Cohen one method of

earning a living which was condemned in

scathing terms by the rabbi's was usury

a man who practice it was precluded from

giving evidence in a court of law come

and see the blindness of the user errs

if a man call his fellow a villain the

latter proceeds against him even to the

extent of depriving of his live with it

but user errs take witnesses scribe pen

and ink and write and seal the document

to the

I mean woody guthrie put that in a more

popular phrase when he said some men

will rob you with a six-gun and some

with a fountain pen and so that's what

he's alluding to but he said no matter

how far you roam you'll never see an

outlaw take a family from its home not

like the bankers whoever has money and

lends it without interest of him as

written he that putteth not out his

money to user he shall never be moved

hence you can learn that if a man lends

on interest his possessions will be

moved users are comparable to shedders

of blood Cato the Elder was asked about

user he he said user II asked me about

murder he equated it with murder and

there's reasons for that would that the

monitor people don't understand

unfortunately because we don't fully

grasp it one of the most important

things and this is why it's so good to

see this issue being addressed justo

Gonzales and I would recommend reading

this book faith and wealth a history of

early Christian ideas on the origin

significance and use of money in

Gonzales his book what he shows very

clearly is one of the most central and

important issues that Christians were

grappling with was the ethical use of

wealth they were obsessed with it in

their writings but what he says on the

outlines of the actual relationship

between faith and wealth there's and

there is also remarkable unanimity it's

one of the few things they really agreed

on to the point that certain themes

appear again and again usery by witches

usually meant any loan on interest is

universally condemned in the early

church the one possible exception is

clement of alexandria who may have held

that the prescription of loans on

interest applies only to loans to other

believers but even this possibility is

based only on a debatable interpretation

of a single text so user ii was seen as

condemned and and this is obviously the

chasing them out love your enemies do

good to them and lend to them without

expecting to get anything right even

your enemies so this is really

abrogating that idea of lending to the

the enemy which is why he put it in

there and it's interesting that modern

Christians have justified usury with the

Luke story about the man who comes with

the the talons and he gives his each one

he gives him ten and five and one and

then two of them work it in the third

one he just hides it and he says oh I

knew you're an austere and cruel man and

you take what's not yours and you reap

what you don't sell so I just hit it and

here it is here and he said you you're

your condemnation of me is my judgment

against you you should have known that I

would have wanted more and you should

have put it in a bank and gotten

interest so he used the example of a

wicked tyrant that everybody hates and

says well there's Jesus he's saying user

he's okay

they have very weird interpretation but

hey that's Scripture yeah the nature of

the sin called user has his proper place

in origin in a loan contract this

financial contract between consenting

parties demands by its very nature that

one returned to another only as much as

he has received the sin rests on the

fact that something the creditor desires

more than he's given therefore he

contends some gain is allowed to him

beyond that which he loaned but any gain

which exceeds the amount he gave his

illicit and user EAA's this is an

encyclical a papal encyclical which is

basically Church doctrine the Pope

writes it and then sends it out to all

the churches this is not ex cathedra in

other words it's not considered

infallible because the Pope's rarely use

ex cathedra as a doctrine and but this

was sent in 1745 it was all over by Pope

Benedict the 14th and then it was again

applied to the in cyclical to the whole

the Roman Catholic Church in 1836 during

the reign of Pope Gregory and dr. Noonan

one of the great Catholic scholars says

that it's impossible say that there was

not universal agreement on the

prohibition of usury charging for the

loan of money is unjust as such for you

are selling something that doesn't exist

this is the important distinction that

the the medieval 's understood that

money is a means of exchange

it is not meant in and of itself to be a

source of income you can invest money by

buying goods and products and selling

them as a businessman but when you loan

money and make money off the money you

have perverted the purpose of money

which is a means of exchange and you

have made it an end as a good is an end

this is how they understood it the word

in Greek for usury was tacos which means

to give birth and this is why he has

them on a barren sandy completely on

fertile because what they've done is

they've made something that should be

unfertile in its essence but it causes

things to grow if it's used properly and

so this is this is a Thomas saying some

things like food are concerned by use so

that the use can't be separated from the

thing when we let someone use such

things and we transfer the ownership of

the thing itself so if you sell a

sandwich you've transferred the

ownership of sandwich and so the use of

the sandwich was which its consumption

is you can't charge them for that and

that's why bankers literally get their

cake and eat it too literally

it's amazing so so now when we let

somebody use such things than we

transfer knowledge if we tried to sell

wine and it's used separately we would

be selling the same thing twice over or

selling something non-existent that

would clearly be unjust by the same

token then it is unjust to lend wine and

then as for the twofold recompense the

restoration of some equivalent and

charge for its use this is what user he

is a use charge in such cases there are

however things which are not in this

abuse

st. Thomas always preempts what you're

gonna object to right he even really

he's quite stunning in that he

constantly does that he just he thinks

okay what are they gonna say to this one

and then boom he answers you so he said

there are however things which are not

consumed by you a house is used by

living in it not by pulling it down so

here we can separate the thing from its

use transferring the ownership for

example while reserving the use for

or vice-versa allowing someone the use

and retaining its ownership this is why

one can listen for a houses use and

later ask for its return as happens in

letting and renting so now Aristotle

tells us money was invented for the

purpose of exchange and that its prime

and proper use is in its consumption and

disbursement by being spent in

transactions it follows that it is in

principle wrong to charge for the loan

of money as is done in usury now in the

Islamic view allodynia Karuna rely upon

Allah , a poem on Lydia Taha Babu who

ship an omen and mess those who devour

usery

will rise only like the one who rises to

be knocked down by a demon as if

possessed by madness my teacher said

Abdullah remember who's one of the

foremost authorities on Islamic finance

said that this is the boom-bust cycle of

a new serious society they rise only to

be knocked down and this will happen

again and again throughout history the

Quran says those who consume interest

cannot stand except this one stands who

is being beaten by Satan as a demon oh

you have believed do not consume user he

doubled and multiplied but fear that you

may be in order to be successful now in

traditional views of all forms of wealth

acquisition the most unnatural and

odious is that by means of usury

Aristotle in the politics John Addison I

love this one a moneylender he serves

you in the present tense he lends you in

the conditional mood keeps you in the

subjunctive and ruins you in the future

I mean really great stuff nothing like

the English for stringing words together

usery dolls and damps all industries

improvements and new inventions where

and money would be stirring if it were

not for this slug provision and that's

why why how are they trying to stimulate

the economy now they just keep lowering

the interest rate right just keep

lowering it down but there's deeper

problems and this is I'm gonna get to

this anyway john maynard keynes says

this very interesting that he used he

was brought up to believe that the

attitude of the church was to the rate

of interest was inherently absurd and

that the subtle discussions aimed at

distinguishing between the return of

money loans from the return of active

investments were merely Jesuitical

attempts to find a practical escape from

a foolish theory but I now read these

discussions as an honest intellectual

effort to keep separate what classical

Theory has inextricably confused

together the rate of interest and the

marginal efficiency of capital and he

distinguished he invented the marginal

efficiency of capital so that's the nice

thing about inventing your own terms is

that you define them as well

so but he basically the marginal

efficiency of counts of capital is what

it's worth which is not necessary the

interest rate so most economists would

see the same thing he saw it as

different but his point was is that they

recognize there is a difference between

the capital itself and and and the

interest itself and they distinguish

between those two and and but it's

prohibition is is for a very different

reason

I already mentioned that from now back

to to Dante now we're in the fraud now

why why is greed violent fraud is not

one of the seven deadly sins and the

seven deadly sins Aquinas says deadly

sins are capital sins which means they

breed other sins in the same way that

you have moral virtues are virtues that

are the source or the matrix of other

virtues so courage when you think of

generosity generosity is a virtue but

generosity is subsumed under the virtue

of courage because you can't be generous

without courage your your your your your

literally going against the fear

of losing your wealth by giving it to

somebody else and so it's a very

sophisticated system but fraud st.

Thomas identifies these are called the

daughters of the seven deadly sins and

he has each of the sins have daughters

like one of the sins the daughters of

lust is that you begin to hate God you

begin to lose any sense of spirituality

because you're so subsumed by the

sensual but in the daughters of greed he

has treachery he has fraud

so fraud is a daughter of greed it's a

daughter of avarice yeah and it's

important to note also that the deadly

sins are not acts they are states of

being so greed is not an act it's a

symptom when you see somebody acting

greedily that what he's doing is a

symptom but the actual disease is a

state of being and so he's got the first

ones are the the panders and the

seducers the fraudulent men there's

there's a book now that was on the front

table of borders and Barnes & Noble

called the players Bible and it was a

book on how to seduce women like it

teaches you how to seduce women and and

what's interesting about this is that

apparently there's a whole underground

group of these guys that communicate on

internet and exchange how they do these

things I read an article about this and

it was quite shocking to see this but

this is this is a type of fraud like to

know the right things to say to a woman

in order to seduce her right and that's

what they do so they're fraudulent and

he he has this horrible geureon which is

a from from Greek mythology which is a

monster with a beautiful face and it's

got a poisonous tail and that's how he

personifies fraud and so and and and

this is also he's got the flatterers who

are literally up to it in cracked like

they're full of it literally I mean in

in Hell so there he's got the the

glutton the

witness our being rained down by feces

rain it's like so the flatterers are

those those people and this also is you

he would probably today put the ad

executives down here if he was a lot the

scientists are those who sell from Simon

Magus and in the New Testament who tries

to buy the gifts of the Holy Spirit and

puts obviously the church was having a

difficult time with that and then divin

errs astrologers and magicians he would

probably put people like and he put the

people of his time like the people that

read Dante knew all the names because

they were familiar with all the people

they were like celebrities of the time

so he would put probably like these

people dive in or dinners he would put

these guys on CNN who do the the

prognostication for where the stock

market's going you know telling you what

to buy and things like that and then

he's got the the Bears who are what the

Simon is are to the church the barriers

are to government they're the people

that accept bribes and then he's got the

hypocrites the thieves

fraudulent counselors and it's

interesting the man that advised Caesar

to cross the Rubicon is here so it's the

people that give fraudulent advice like

the people that told the to go into Iraq

for instance under false pretenses

because many of them knew and this is

all come out so we know that this is the

the the type of and then solar's of

scandal and schism this is where

unfortunately for Muslims he has the

Prophet Mohammed with Adi now I want to

and I you know this is difficult for me

but I would like to defend a little bit

Dante Dante Dante put him it in among

the schismatic s-- there is another

group in in the heretics which is where

the false prophets were he is not I'm

sorry not in in the he's in the the

false prophets are in the they're in the

eighth circle I think they're in the

first bowl gia he does not put them with

the false prophets he puts him

with the schismatic so now the

schismatic SAR the Eastern Churches and

this is in essence acknowledging that

these are believers but they saw schism

was actually because it created violence

and rupture in society it's also not a

disease of fraud and this is pointed out

by the commentators in Dante that he

puts him here because the the the fraud

is in their own misperception of the

world this is this is how he does it and

I also want to say that these people

that he puts here are not the people and

that's why people say oh he put his

enemies in hell and he was just cruel

and just know these are personifications

he is personifying the idea of schism

and that was something very close to a

deeply divided world between christians

and muslims who were fighting then as

unfortunately we are now so but then he

puts the falsifiers

alright now what's interesting to me

he's got the counterfeiters and the

alchemist and and and and the people

that the coin i want to look at this was

110 years ago when the earl lectures

were founded look at what the dollar the

purchasing power of the dollar was

alright because what you could buy you

see is it has diminished to the point so

for instance my grandfather who sold

bubblegum as a ten year old boy in in

San Francisco down on Market Street in

1906 he used to sell it I think for a

penny little packages of bubble gum so

all you have to do is look at how much

that package cost today and in those

days it was organic right so so you'd

even have to like double the price to

get the organic bubble gum but just look

at the purchasing power of the dollar

that has been declining and then our

debt 56 trillion and this is it's

actually higher than this now but this

is the current liabilities and unfounded

promises okay we only have about 15

trillion dollar

in circulation and this is what we owe

in liabilities Social Security met a cow

all these things okay I mean this is a

real crises so our current national

debts at about 12 trillion right and our

budget was close to two trillion so now

most of this again we're going a large

portion is going to defense and another

portion is going to interest on the

national debt now this is old wine in a

new bottle so because in the old days

you had gangsters and the thing about

gangsters is that they would just go in

and usually have like they would cover

and they'd go in and rob the bank now

they get on the boards it's much more

clever series and this is not

exaggeration there's a book called the

best way to rob a bank is to own one

and this is what these people have been

doing and it's really quite stunning now

I just look at this statement Wall

Street with its vast banks in New York

City and associated banks and all other

large cities suggested that there was a

prospect of most disastrous panic that

the world and and that had known unless

Congress gave them emergency currency

neither could these great swivel-chair

operators of Wall Street exploit the

commerce that would follow between the

war nations and our country has a great

profiteering game unless Uncle Sam came

to their aid and financially that is

would give them more currency okay

instead of aiding the people as the

Congress as the government should have

done Congress immediately passed and

emergency currency Act to Furness the

banks that the speculators controlled

all the money they should need till they

could operate the Federal Reserve Act

the speculators received from Uncle Sam

nearly four hundred million dollars okay

that would be about four hundred billion

today under the provisions of the

emergency currency act and when the

Federal Reserve Act really got to

operating they had nearly four hundred

million at one time under that act and

they could get as much more as they

wanted

that's congressman Charles Lindbergh

senior who was this the father of

Charles Lindbergh who flew across the

Atlantic he was a congressman that was

opposed to the Federal Reserve but my

point is is that it's the same game too

big to fail this is how it's all fear

and this is one of the things that the

the the panders and the seducers they

use fear and desire to trick people and

and and to get what they want now it is

an old maxim and a very sound one that

that he who dances should always pay the

fiddler now sir in the present case of

any gentleman whose money is a burden to

them choose to lead off a dance I am

decidedly opposed to the people's money

being used to pay the fiddler no one can

doubt that the examination proposed by

this resolution must cost the state some

ten or twelve thousand dollars a lot of

money in 1837 and all this to settle a

question in which the people have no

interest in about which they care

nothing these capitalists generally act

harmoniously and in concert to fleece

the people and now that they have got

into a quarrel with themselves we are

called upon to appropriate the people's

money to settle the quarrel because they

wanted money over a stock collapse that

happened and this is an old game now I

want to talk about America's great fairy

tale you see every culture has to have

some really profound fairy tale and and

ours is the Wizard of Oz now The Wizard

of Oz about the time the Earl lectures

were being initiated there was a

character named William Jennings Bryan

in fact a hundred and ten years ago he

would have just found out that he lost

the 1900 election for president he ran

on the anti-imperialism platform he was

an he was a pacifist they called him a

coward they considered him a coward he

was a pacifist

he was also pro farming and and our

farmers people have no idea how much our

farmers have suffered in this country

really the suicide rate is the highest

amongst farmers I mean these are people

tied to the land and when the lands

taken away from them and and they're

forced into this agribusiness Gresham's

dynamic which is that the cheaters drive

out the honest people now I just want to

look at this fairy tale because bomb was

was basically given us an allegory at

this time when he was writing this the

great debate in the United States was

over finance reform and

this Dorothea represents um the American

the good American from Kansas good

Midwest state she's on a farm and BOM

describes her her you know her aunt and

her uncle never smile it's a barren farm

because it's drought and then basically

she meets she goes to this land she

lands on the Wicked Witch of the East

Wall Street and she and and the

munchkins the little factory workers are

freed and they're really happy and then

the Good Witch of the North which is

where all the support for the populace

were come down and she gives her the

silver slippers which turned into ruby

slippers in the film but in the book

they're silver slippers and then she's

told to go to Oz because she wants to

get back to Kansas follow the yellow

brick road they were on the gold

standard in 1873 this country removed

the silver standard and they demonetised

silver which created an incredible

burden on farmers because gold was rich

people's money silver was poor people's

money and it was made illegal for people

to use and that's Bryan's famous the

cross of gold don't crucify us on a

cross of gold so the yellow brick road

leads that emerald forests the green

backs because the currency was tied to

the gold and and in the book they all

wear emerald glasses that have a string

connected to a gold belt and the

Scarecrow represents the kind of simple

farmers that were intelligent but not

educated and they needed a brain with

the thoughts I III could be thinking I'd

be another Lincoln if I only had a brain

and then the Tin Man is the industrial

factory workers who are dehumanized

by industry and and this is why the Tin

Man in the book says that he used to be

a real human being that was cutting the

wood but he would cut himself and and

the the tin makers would put him back

together until he became completely tin

but now he's lost his heart because this

is the alienation the dehumanization

that happens in factory workers and then

the Cowardly Lion is William Jennings

Bryant who was called a coward and and

needed the courage and the

power to do this they wanted to restore

bimetallism this was Hamilton's original

vision of this country to have a

bi-metal economy under a gold standard

the amount of credit the and by the way

at the end when she kills the Wicked

Witch of the the West which is where all

the farmers were being held it's the

yellow Wilkie's who are the the the

Chinese workers on the the railroad and

the winget monkeys who were the Native

Americans he was actually quite racist

towards Native Americans but they talked

about how we used to live on the land

and in the forest until these evil

people came and took us over and but how

does she kill the Wicked Witch liquidity

because because that's what they needed

they needed a cash infusion and and she

kind of dissolves into thin air right

what does she say

now I want you to really think about

this I'm coming to a close I know that

because I have to come to an end here

under a gold standard the amount of

credit that an economy can support is

determined by the economy's tangible

assets since every credit instrument is

ultimately a claim on some tangible

asset but government bonds are not

backed by tangible wealth only by the

government's promise to pay out of

future tax revenues and cannot easily be

absorbed by financial markets a large

volume of new government bonds can be

sold to the public only at progressively

higher interest rates thus government

deficient spending deficits spending

under a gold standard is severely

limited the abandonment of the gold

standard made it possible for the

welfare status to use the banking system

as a means to unlimited credit they have

created paper reserves in the form of

government bonds which through a complex

series of steps the banks accept in

place of tangible assets and treat as if

they were an actual deposit this is just

on a ledger in the in the Federal

Reserve as the equivalent of what was

formerly gold the holder of a government

bond or of a bank deposit created by

paper tzer's believes that he has a

valid claim on a real asset the law of

supply and demand is not to be conned as

the supply of money of claims increases

relative to the supply of tangible

assets in the economy prices must

eventually rise thus the earnings saved

by the productive members of society

lose value in terms of goods so if

you're saving money you're losing money

in this system when the economy's books

are finally balanced one finds that this

loss in value represents the goods

purchased by the government for welfare

or other purposes

really it's all defense spending but the

money proceeds and interests of the

government bonds financed by bank credit

expansion in the absence of the gold

standard there is no way to protect

savings from confiscation through

inflation there's no safe store of value

if there were the government would have

to make it illegal as it was done in the

case of gold back in the 30s if everyone

decided for example to convert all his

bank deposits to silver or copper right

they'd lose their purchasing power so

the financial policy of the welfare

state requires that there be no way for

the owners of wealth to protect

themselves this is the shabby secret of

the welfare state as tirades against

gold deficit spending is a simply a

scheme for the confiscation of wealth

gold standards stand in the way of the

insidious process it stands as a

protector of property

if one grasp this one has no difficulty

in understanding the status antagonism

towards the gold standard that was Alan

Greenspan okay

that's true statement alan greenspan a

man who is furnished with arguments from

the mint will convince his antagonists

much sooner than any than one who draws

them from reason and philosophy gold is

a wonderful clearer of understanding it

dissipates every doubt and scruple in an

instant accommodates itself to the

meanest of capacities silences the loud

and clamors and brings over the most

obstinate and inflexible philip of

macedon was a man of most invincible

reason this way he refuted by it all the

wisdom of athens confounded their

Statesman's struck their orders dumb and

at length argued them out of all their

liberties that was addison again when

the freedom they wish for most was the

freedom from responsibility then Athens

ceased to be free and never was free

again that's one of our greatest

scholars on on the Greco tradition I'd

like to end with a poem by Robert Frost

because in the end for me the real two

sources of truth in this world are

revelation and poets and in the Islamic

tradition you can't separate the two

it's a prerequisite to comment on the

poor on that you have to master the

pre-islamic poets literally that is

agreed upon in Islamic tradition what

what poetry enables us the poets

penetrate and the poets are inspired and

and Dante was an inspired poet we can

look at the kind of there are many

things that we would object to but

ultimately Dante's vision is a vision of

every man and every woman's journey back

to God and in the end when Dante has the

beatific vision and and he sees it he's

he says and already my desire and my

will were made one turning by a wheel

yet at one speed the desire and the will

become one there's no more tension

between one's impulses and one's moral

rectitude and then he says

turned by the love that moved the

planets and the stars that love of God

Robert Frost wrote two poems about

economics and one of them he never

published it's called not it's called on

the inflation of the currency 1919 which

was when Wilson inflated the incurrence

he printed up a lot of money in order to

in order to pay for the war debts and he

said the pain of seeing 10 cents turned

to five we clutch with both hands

fiercely at the part we think we feel it

in the head the heart is someone cutting

us in two alive is somewhat at us

cutting us in half we cast a dangerous

look from where we lie up to the

enthroned it kings of earth and sky

they know what's best for them - well -

laughs that's about the bankers they've

convinced people that we need them

there are necessity they confiscate

wealth this misappropriation of wealth

is beyond belief in human history the

amount of money that's been taken out of

your homes people in this room the 401ks

that were destroyed and then he has

another poem and this is a warning to

America he says these words were cut in

stone for permanent these words so these

words I assume were so deeply met meant

they cut themselves in stone for

permanent like trouble in the brow above

the eyes and here's what's chiseled in

stone take care to sell your horse

before he dies the art of life is

passing losses on the city saying it was

Tessa Fong which may a little while by

war and trade have kept had have kept

from being caught with the decayed

infirm worn out and broken on its hands

but judging by what little of it stands

not even the ingenuities of debt could

save it from its law

is being met sand is thrusting in the

square of door across the tessellation

on the floor and only rests a serpent on

its chin content with contemplating

taking in until it can muster breath

inside a Hall inside a hall to rear

against the inscription on the wall

we're this country's money is being

destroyed really it's being destroyed

before our eyes and it's being destroyed

because of debt and debt is something

that is incredibly overwhelming for

people poor people have suffered the

most in this crises and until we take

the responsibility of understanding at a

deeper level the economics of the system

how it works we can't change anything it

was attempted William Jennings Bryan

attempted to do it a hundred and ten

years ago and there's a lot of people

now talking about this now whether we're

able to do it or not I don't know but

this system which is a global system now

and Ussery if you if you study how usery

works more interest on usury is going

out of the third-world countries than

aid going in this is just it's it's a

disgusting game and and it really should

end but whether we can end it or not is

is to be seen thank you very much

[Applause]

okay will now take questions from the

audience just just raise your hand if

you like ask the question thank you you

have continued a PSR tradition of

expanding our minds a lot of us own

homes I own a home isn't it fair for

there to be some interest charged on a

loan you know that's an argument that

was Calvin's argument Calvin

John Calvin was the French he was

originally Roman Catholic and then he

gets in trouble in the Inquisition moves

to Switzerland

the bankers actually erected a statue

for him because he's the first one that

legalizes usury in in in Christianity

but he did it by the idea of interest

and interest was originally a between

time if you delayed payment even by

church doctrine you could be charged in

the same way that they charge on credit

cards today if you're delayed that was a

reasoning what interest meant but what

Calvin did is he distinguished between

interest and usury and saw usury as

unjust or exorbitant at that time

anything higher than 12% would have been

considered usury Justinian the roman

emperor considered it 6% anything over

6% most people don't realize that a lot

of people in these pay day things are

paying sometimes 50% interest what the

bankers did is that they studied all of

the states and their interest laws and

they found out that Delaware and North

Dakota did not have interest law caps

and so they they put their operation

city cores in North Dakota not in New

York because there's usury laws in New

York huh

South Dakota sorry yeah South Dakota now

what's interesting is that

in smiley versus Citicorp smiley it's a

case that went to the Supreme Court

because they kept changing the rates on

on his his thing and so he actually

tried to see if he could put an end to

it and and the Supreme Court ruled

against smiley for Citicorp which ended

caps on these they used to charge five

dollars for a late fee now their shows

like $35 $40 the poorer you are the more

they charge even John Calvin who

accepted interest did not accept it for

poor people and what you have to

understand is the people that suffer

most are the poor people because they

get the worst rates and this is usury

you see most of you are probably in the

700s in your FICO score which is what

Fair Isaac that's the company that

determines it great Fair Isaac now one

of the things they don't tell you is

that anytime you miss a payment the

reason it suddenly drops is because they

want to raise your interest rates the

system's rigged against you but one of

the things that they have special files

for celebrities judges wealthy people

they don't do it to them because they

don't want these people to get angry and

make advocates the number one complaints

given to the Fair Business Bureau in the

United States is again is against credit

cards number one complaint people are

suffering out there most people don't

understand compound interest they don't

understand how if you pay the minimum

payment if we paid them the national

debt if we started paying it one dollar

a day it would take two hundred eighty

eight thousand years to finally pay it

off and in reality you could never pay

it off because of the nature of interest

so the point here is is you know

obviously companies have to make money

and things like that

renting money is in in the Islamic

tradition it's absolutely forbidden but

usury has always been even in the Muslim

world there's never been a society that

has been completely freed of interest

but there should be at least just rates

just rates and the people that suffer

most again are the poor people and and

we we should

advocates for these people because these

payday loans and people think these are

pawn brokers and schemers most of these

inner-city payday loans are owned by

Wells Fargo Bank of America seriously

it's just like it's it's like Disney you

know Disney has touchstone for their

racy films because they didn't want to

taint the name of Disney this is a very

sophisticated system and what you have

to realize is it's not that you know

they're all evil and is us and them this

is people that are afflicted with states

of being that are very unhealthy they're

not well and and part of what what what

you know just laws are to regulate

people from their own bad nature